Re: Pgpool-II 4.7.0 released.

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: emond(dot)papegaaij(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgpool-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pgpool-II 4.7.0 released.
Date: 2026-01-23 07:25:26
Message-ID: 20260123.162526.1291014725918553616.ishii@postgresql.org
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgpool-general

> Ok, so we will have following 4 new params?
>
> wd_listen_addresses
> wd_listen_port
> wd_heartbeat_listen_addresses
> wd_heartbeat_listen_port

After thinking more, I feel like it would be overkill to allow to
specify multiple IPs for wd_listen_addresses and
wd_heartbeat_listen_addresses.

If so, we can decide to allow only 1 IP for each parameter and change
the names to:

wd_listen_address
wd_heartbeat_listen_address

What do you think?

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgpool-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Emond Papegaaij 2026-01-23 09:02:03 Re: Pgpool-II 4.7.0 released.
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2026-01-23 04:35:10 Re: Pgpool-II 4.7.0 released.