Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem

From: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-Dev <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem
Date: 2016-11-17 18:42:55
Message-ID: CAGTBQpby_sRTLzctJgHgda81L5cs=3gieP7gPnZCdP2qgC6T1w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I glanced at the patches but the both patches don't obey the coding
>> style of PostgreSQL.
>> Please refer to [1].
>>
>> [1] http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Developer_FAQ#What.27s_the_formatting_style_used_in_PostgreSQL_source_code.3F.
>
> I thought I had. I'll go through that list to check what I missed.

Attached is patch 0002 with pgindent applied over it

I don't think there's any other formatting issue, but feel free to
point a finger to it if I missed any

Attachment Content-Type Size
0002-Vacuum-allow-using-more-than-1GB-work-mem.patch text/x-patch 20.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2016-11-17 18:53:58 Re: proposal: psql \setfileref
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-11-17 18:41:02 Re: Fun fact about autovacuum and orphan temp tables