Re: Making clausesel.c Smarter

From: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Making clausesel.c Smarter
Date: 2017-04-03 20:32:32
Message-ID: CAGTBQpanOLtzngzWi8HYC0Cn4Vb=a_siN30u55dk_or=cL3vZA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2017-04-03 20:59:42 +1200, David Rowley wrote:
>> Updated patch attached.
>>
>> Thanks for reviewing it.
>
> Given the time in the release cycle I'm afraid that this it's too late
> to get this into v10. Does anybody disagree? If not, it should be
> moved to the next CF.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund

While personally I'd like to see this patch make it (I got bitten by
this more than once), I can't argue with that logic with the feature
freeze almost upon us, especially given the stage the review is at
(ie: just beginning).

I'm still going to review it though.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-04-03 20:34:05 Re: identity columns
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2017-04-03 20:31:59 Re: Unable to build doc on latest head