| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Vitaly Burovoy <vitaly(dot)burovoy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: identity columns |
| Date: | 2017-04-03 20:34:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20170403203405.6mxkewsyhfyixnh2@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-04-03 16:31:27 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Is it guaranteed that the caller expects an int64? I saw that
> > nextvalueexpr's have a typeid field.
>
> It expects one of the integer types. We could cast the result of
> Int64GetDatum() to the appropriate type, but that wouldn't actually do
> anything.
Uh. What about 32bit systems (and 64bit systems without
float8passbyval)?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2017-04-03 20:34:17 | Re: SERIALIZABLE with parallel query |
| Previous Message | Claudio Freire | 2017-04-03 20:32:32 | Re: Making clausesel.c Smarter |