Re: Use of non-restart-safe storage by temp_tablespaces

From: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Use of non-restart-safe storage by temp_tablespaces
Date: 2017-05-29 19:08:55
Message-ID: CAGTBQpaGTvHCHZU9cKYw+tBrKTn0wmCa4fyHJPRSRs700CXdCg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Right now we don't document that temp_tablespaces can use
> non-restart-safe storage, e.g. /tmp, ramdisks. Would this be safe?
> Should we document this?

I have set up things like that, but it's nontrivial.

Just pointing the tablespace to non'restart'safe storage will get you
an installation that fails to boot after a restart, since there's a
tree structure that is expected to survive, and when it's not found,
postgres just fails to boot.

Or just use the tablespaces, I forget which. But in essence, it won't
do to do just that. What I ended up doing was backing up the empty
tablespace and adding a restore to system bootup scripts, so that
after a restart postgres finds an empty tablespace there.

So, there's a lot of internal hackery to document if you'd like to
document that kind of usage.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2017-05-29 19:14:07 Re: psql: Activate pager only for height, not width
Previous Message Andres Freund 2017-05-29 18:59:28 Re: logical replication busy-waiting on a lock