Re: Use of non-restart-safe storage by temp_tablespaces

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Use of non-restart-safe storage by temp_tablespaces
Date: 2017-05-29 19:15:37
Message-ID: 20170529191537.bs654gil2qsl2krk@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Right now we don't document that temp_tablespaces can use
> > non-restart-safe storage, e.g. /tmp, ramdisks. Would this be safe?
> > Should we document this?
>
> I have set up things like that, but it's nontrivial.

I think it'd be smart to support the use case directly, because there's
interest in it being actually supported (unlike the statu quo).
Something like restoring the tablespace to the empty state on boot, if
it's known to need it.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2017-05-29 19:21:50 Re: logical replication busy-waiting on a lock
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2017-05-29 19:14:07 Re: psql: Activate pager only for height, not width