Re: Perfomance bug in v10

From: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Perfomance bug in v10
Date: 2017-06-02 14:50:56
Message-ID: CAGTBQpYt0F1QoCxxY_u58Upb-rnjjYBQEEKUXeS-gJ+cp6f0wQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> wrote:
>> There were old threads about considering a risk factor when estimating
>> plans, and I'm thinking this issue is the planner failing to do
>> exactly that.
>>
> I'm afraid it's tool late for v10

Clearly

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-06-02 15:02:48 Re: Perfomance bug in v10
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2017-06-02 14:46:48 Re: Perfomance bug in v10