Re: Perfomance bug in v10

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
To: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Perfomance bug in v10
Date: 2017-06-02 14:46:48
Message-ID: 5ca5644a-7d61-558b-d417-56154a92785b@sigaev.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> There were old threads about considering a risk factor when estimating
> plans, and I'm thinking this issue is the planner failing to do
> exactly that.
>
I'm afraid it's tool late for v10

--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Freire 2017-06-02 14:50:56 Re: Perfomance bug in v10
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2017-06-02 14:42:42 Re: Range Merge Join v1