| From: | shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Palak Chaturvedi <chaturvedipalak1911(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Make pg_prewarm, autoprewarm yield for waiting DDL |
| Date: | 2026-09-17 03:04:11 |
| Message-ID: | CAGRkXqT+tb+8-XqDn2QvOzfh9R9Wi7RXgWHaCQgf8qdN=Zp+Kw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
CommitFest entry 7098 was created for this work, but the mail thread was
detached from it on September 7. The entry now has no thread at all, so
cfbot has nothing to build, and the patch will not show up for anyone
looking for something to review. The entry is still marked Needs review.
Bharath, the history shows you made that change. Should the entry be
closed, or should the thread go back on it? Happy to do either.
Best regards,
Shihao Zhong
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | wenhui qiu | 2026-09-17 03:30:18 | Re: [PATCH v1] Optimize 64-bit atomic access on RV64 |
| Previous Message | shveta malik | 2026-09-17 02:59:58 | Re: Distinguish publication exclusions in object addresses |