| From: | shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Any reason to keep HEAP_HASOID_OLD? |
| Date: | 2026-10-21 01:38:59 |
| Message-ID: | CAGRkXqSivJiro97erykS+nNgkq1jJAaHpnUrQuoBEWoS=0Uq_w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Should we get rid of HEAP_HASOID_OLD and the code that relates to it?
>
> Looks like it.
Patch attached. It removes the define, the doc paragraph about the oid
field, and everything pageinspect did with it.
The bit is kept as a comment so nobody reuses it.
master only.
Thanks,
Shihao
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v1-0001-Remove-HEAP_HASOID_OLD.patch | application/octet-stream | 13.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chao Li | 2026-10-21 01:50:23 | Re: tablecmds: Deadlock caused by Attach Partition |
| Previous Message | shihao zhong | 2026-10-21 01:06:55 | Re: Improving scalability of Parallel Bitmap Heap/Index Scan |