Re: Improving scalability of Parallel Bitmap Heap/Index Scan

From: shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Geier <geidav(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improving scalability of Parallel Bitmap Heap/Index Scan
Date: 2026-10-21 01:06:55
Message-ID: CAGRkXqS3WDAwVn0ybJiRrSte8HvSKm1W=3Db4CZ=3ie=X5ZWdg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi David, John,

Sorry for the confusion, David got it right. It is a separate cleanup for
ST_COMPARE_RUNTIME_POINTER.

Thanks,
Shihao

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shihao zhong 2026-10-21 01:38:59 Re: Any reason to keep HEAP_HASOID_OLD?
Previous Message shihao zhong 2026-10-21 00:56:45 Re: Trying out <stdatomic.h>