Re: improving handling of FPIs during recovery prefetching

From: shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jan Nidzwetzki <jan(at)planetscale(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeremy Schneider <schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: improving handling of FPIs during recovery prefetching
Date: 2026-11-08 00:08:34
Message-ID: CAGRkXqQy4Wpya0TmgNAfS0eWTGbO66fMHQz8PeVC25Vx6Z4uTw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Jan,

Thanks for digging into this. You're right, the static count in the test is
brittle.

The updated TAP test addressed your concern.

Thanks,
Shihao

Attachment Content-Type Size
nocfbot-v2-skip_fpi-test.diff.txt text/plain 3.9 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message shihao zhong 2026-11-08 00:17:02 Re: First draft of PG 19 release notes
Previous Message Sho Ito 2026-11-08 00:03:07 Re: [DEPARSE] Parameters in SQL-standard function bodies do not read back