Re: Gather Merge

From: Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Gather Merge
Date: 2017-01-18 06:01:25
Message-ID: CAGPqQf06SuTEg-c2pVQMTcxOeBwjR_+hJx5mEfOUJNOHwhHDfw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Rushabh Lathia
> <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Here is the benchmark number which I got with the latest (v6) patch:
> >
> > - max_worker_processes = DEFAULT (8)
> > - max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 4
> > - Cold cache environment is ensured. With every query execution - server
> is
> > stopped and also OS caches were dropped.
> > - The reported values of execution time (in ms) is median of 3
> executions.
> > - power2 machine with 512GB of RAM
> > - With default postgres.conf
> >
>
> You haven't mentioned scale factor used in these tests.
>

Oops sorry. Those results are for scale factor 10.

>
> --
> With Regards,
> Amit Kapila.
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>

--
Rushabh Lathia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mithun Cy 2017-01-18 06:21:23 Re: Cache Hash Index meta page.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-01-18 05:46:16 Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol