Re: Gather Merge

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Gather Merge
Date: 2017-01-17 13:14:59
Message-ID: CAA4eK1KVqFhdkaajivA0tONN_m0wZE3qFtR_w6VK8tAPLOCToA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Rushabh Lathia
<rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Here is the benchmark number which I got with the latest (v6) patch:
>
> - max_worker_processes = DEFAULT (8)
> - max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 4
> - Cold cache environment is ensured. With every query execution - server is
> stopped and also OS caches were dropped.
> - The reported values of execution time (in ms) is median of 3 executions.
> - power2 machine with 512GB of RAM
> - With default postgres.conf
>

You haven't mentioned scale factor used in these tests.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-01-17 13:26:28 Re: Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(XLogCtl->Insert.exclusiveBackup)", File: "xlog.c", Line: 10200)
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2017-01-17 13:14:10 ISO/IEC 9075-2:2016 for postgres community