Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm

From: Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm
Date: 2024-03-28 19:44:12
Message-ID: CAGPVpCSJN5sdSB6bjGCuP5v_6=zPhTeZef_VhsRStiyHci+rLg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 14:39 David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 at 12:46, Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I did all of the above changes and it seems like those resolved the
> regression issue.
>
> Thanks for adjusting the patch. The numbers do look better, but on
> looking at your test.sh script from [1], I see:
>
> meson setup --buildtype debug -Dcassert=true
> --prefix="$DESTDIR/usr/local/pgsql" $DESTDIR && \
>
> can you confirm if the test was done in debug with casserts on? If
> so, it would be much better to have asserts off and have
> -Dbuildtype=release.

Yes, previous numbers were with --buildtype debug -Dcassert=true. I can
share new numbers with release build and asserts off soon.

Thanks,
Melih

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melih Mutlu 2024-03-28 19:47:24 Re: Flushing large data immediately in pqcomm
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-03-28 19:36:14 Re: Properly pathify the union planner