Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format

From: Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, "Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu)" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format
Date: 2023-03-15 10:03:23
Message-ID: CAGPVpCQSZkHDmaOhP2YtG+t24K_=wFsRkHqw+6TbvJW+0Tc+ew@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, 15 Mar 2023 Çar, 12:31 tarihinde
şunu yazdı:

> On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 4:32 PM Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>

> What purpose does this test serve w.r.t this patch? Before checking
> the sync for different column orders, the patch has already changed
> binary to false, so it doesn't seem to test the functionality of this
> patch. Am, I missing something?
>

I missed that binary has changed to false before testing column orders. I
moved that test case up before changing binary to false.
Please see v14 [1].

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAGPVpCTaXYctCUp3z%3D_BstonHiZcC5Jj7584i7B8jeZQq4RJkw%40mail.gmail.com

Thanks,
--
Melih Mutlu
Microsoft

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2023-03-15 10:18:41 postgres_fdw: Useless if-test in GetConnection()
Previous Message Melih Mutlu 2023-03-15 10:00:54 Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format