From: | Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Report replica identity in pg_publication_tables |
Date: | 2025-07-01 14:28:30 |
Message-ID: | CAGPVpCQPe0Nk6=Kqggc9zXs5GJ-MRDmQLT0DEJ0X-DVuKp3SQA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Ashutosh,
Thanks for the patch.
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, 30 Haz 2025 Pzt, 13:14
tarihinde şunu yazdı:
> The replica identity of a given table is not a property of
> publication, per say, so it's arguable whether it should be included
> in pg_publication_tables or not. But the output seems to be useful.
> E.g. from the tests
>
To my understanding, pg_publication_tables doesn’t just contain publication
properties, but also information about the tables included in the
publication. As long as the exposed information about the published tables
is relevant in the context of publications in logical replication, I think
it’s reasonable to include it in pg_publication_tables. IMHO replica
identity seems like relevant information.
Regards,
--
Melih Mutlu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2025-07-01 14:31:01 | Re: Add os_page_num to pg_buffercache |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2025-07-01 14:24:40 | Re: No error checking when reading from file using zstd in pg_dump |