Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner

From: Jelte Fennema <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Jesse Zhang <sbjesse(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner
Date: 2023-06-15 15:26:58
Message-ID: CAGECzQTvfpkyyRoGscSuS7ySCEXOO1DCi3eztHQbGEDrj_nt4g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 22 Apr 2023 at 13:42, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> Perhaps we should start with a buildfarm module, which would run pg_indent --show-diff. That would only need to run on one animal, so a failure wouldn't send the whole buildfarm red. This would be pretty easy to do.

Just to be clear on where we are. Is there anything blocking us from
doing this, except for the PG16 branch cut? (that I guess is planned
somewhere in July?)

Just doing this for pgindent and not for perltidy would already be a
huge improvement over the current situation IMHO.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Jacobson 2023-06-15 15:55:56 Re: Do we want a hashset type?
Previous Message Isaac Morland 2023-06-15 14:55:01 Re: When IMMUTABLE is not.