Re: Make copyObject work in C++

From: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Make copyObject work in C++
Date: 2026-01-26 10:47:24
Message-ID: CAGECzQTiQBs7SchE2um1VKbEzP7QCmaHKezj0mofqhPC60w7qQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 25 Jan 2026 at 21:06, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Named args make that easier in two ways: First, only extensions using the
> to-be-removed option will fail. Second, removal of options reliably generates
> errors, rather than bogusly use one field for another, just because the types
> are compatible.

Fair enough, for removals it has some benefits. Still seems like a
relatively small win for something I don't expect us to be doing
anytime soon (name and version I expect to stay around forever).

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2026-01-26 10:49:42 Re: Fix a reference error for window functions: In the function 'find_window_functions', the deduplication logic should be removed
Previous Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2026-01-26 10:43:54 Re: Make copyObject work in C++