| From: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Make copyObject work in C++ |
| Date: | 2026-01-26 10:43:54 |
| Message-ID: | CAGECzQTW4JBdydafZ53w7nyZ8NH+itpSDbo7xY9Lw+jP=pV+ZQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 at 11:29, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> Maybe it would be enough to only support PG_MODULE_MAGIC (without
> arguments) in C++ for now.
You mean by explicitly ifdefing out PG_MODULE_MAGIC_EXT to make it
unusable in C++? Or just not adding the additional documentation that
I added in my patch?
I'm currently using PG_MODULE_MAGIC_EXT in the C++ extension that I
maintain, and I'd prefer to continue doing so. Especially because it
(currently) doesn't have to work on MSVC for my purposes.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2026-01-26 10:47:24 | Re: Make copyObject work in C++ |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2026-01-26 10:29:42 | Re: Make copyObject work in C++ |