| From: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, rmt(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PG18 protocol version |
| Date: | 2025-07-03 05:50:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAGECzQRk1pJP0mD-n8z4JBM11gPxsCxmU3S=N9DnaJ04FTrtgA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 at 04:11, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> After thinking more, I reached a conclusion it would better to apply
> attached simple patch to v18 since v18 is already in the beta phase
> and we want to make changes to it minimal.
I thought that clarifying docs was exactly one of the things the beta
period is about. But if not, your patch seems fine too.
CC-ing RMT for clarification
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2025-07-03 06:13:10 | Re: BackendKeyData is mandatory? |
| Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2025-07-03 05:26:56 | Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication |