| From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl |
| Cc: | hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, rmt(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PG18 protocol version |
| Date: | 2025-07-11 01:47:04 |
| Message-ID: | 20250711.104704.1023660514646002771.ishii@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 at 04:11, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> After thinking more, I reached a conclusion it would better to apply
>> attached simple patch to v18 since v18 is already in the beta phase
>> and we want to make changes to it minimal.
>
> I thought that clarifying docs was exactly one of the things the beta
> period is about. But if not, your patch seems fine too.
>
> CC-ing RMT for clarification
I have pushed my patch to REL_18_STABLE branch and your patch to master.
Thanks.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2025-07-11 02:22:36 | Re: Some ExecSeqScan optimizations |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2025-07-11 00:12:02 | Re: pg_dump --with-* options |