| From: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ci: namespace ccache by PostgreSQL major version |
| Date: | 2026-07-16 22:19:33 |
| Message-ID: | CAGECzQQ6auMC+Y8sRySYR7dphR-o8PDw4=L5LvvFFPAw-4GOUg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 16 Jul 2026 at 23:27, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Attached is the change I propose.
Seems reasonable (assuming it indeed fixes the issue)
Regardless, I think we should still scope the caches on PG version
though for a completely different reason: Any backpatches (currently
only to 19) will become less and less cached as PG20 diverges from
PG19 if we have a shared cache. We should in addition make sure that
we create shared cached from REL_XX_STABLE branches and generate their
cache keys in a way that other branches restore them.
To be clear, this would look quite different from Bilal's patch.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Melanie Plageman | 2026-07-16 22:35:30 | Re: Why clearing the VM doesn't require registering vm buffer in wal record |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2026-07-16 22:11:18 | Re: Hash index AM fake LSN oversight |