| From: | Siddharth Kothari <sidkot(at)google(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Vaibhav Jain <jainva(at)google(dot)com>, Madhukar <madhukarprasad(at)google(dot)com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add RetrieveInstrumentation hook for CustomScan providers |
| Date: | 2026-08-18 05:12:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAGCUe0JpCu3HmKFcYO+ByoOrKx0YBYC0uS+hDTy8XewEhnNDbw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I think the idea looks fine, and the patch looks good to me.
> One suggestion, not on the patch itself, but while responding on
> pgsql-hackers: avoid top-posting your replies. You can check out the
> community etiquette guidelines here:
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists
Thanks for taking a look Dilip! Noted.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2026 at 6:06 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> wrote:
> Sorry for not responding earlier. The here's usually reduced review
> bandwidth over the summer, with people focusing on stabilization of the
> new release. This year there's also an influx of AI bug reports, so
> people are busy with addressing those.
>
> I expect to take a closer look at the new patch version early September.
Thanks Tomas. No worries, appreciate your help!
Regards,
Siddharth
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrey Rachitskiy | 2026-08-18 05:27:01 | Re: Residual cleanups for tied objects in PL/Perl |
| Previous Message | Shinya Kato | 2026-08-18 05:10:18 | Re: Logical replication row filter loses unchanged toasted columns |