Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command

From: Josef Šimánek <josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: daniel(at)yesql(dot)se
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command
Date: 2020-07-02 12:42:16
Message-ID: CAFp7QwrcvY58PUBk-++QQhDSsW+rN-xX_3MH+tBGmTbYXeeW-g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

čt 2. 7. 2020 v 14:25 odesílatel Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> napsal:

> The automated patchtester for the Commitfest gets confused when there are
> two
> versions of the same changeset attached to the email, as it tries to apply
> them
> both which obviously results in an application failure. I've attached
> just the
> previously submitted patch version to this email to see if we can get a
> test
> run of it.
>

Thanks, I'm new to commitfest and I was confused as well. I tried to
reattach the thread there. I'll prepare a new patch soon, what should I do?
Just attach it again?

> cheers ./daniel
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-07-02 12:51:40 Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2020-07-02 12:39:14 Re: WIP: Aggregation push-down