| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josef Šimánek <josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command |
| Date: | 2020-07-02 12:51:40 |
| Message-ID: | 73EB652A-F790-40F2-BBA4-8E0DB2474D42@yesql.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 2 Jul 2020, at 14:42, Josef Šimánek <josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> čt 2. 7. 2020 v 14:25 odesílatel Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se <mailto:daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>> napsal:
> The automated patchtester for the Commitfest gets confused when there are two
> versions of the same changeset attached to the email, as it tries to apply them
> both which obviously results in an application failure. I've attached just the
> previously submitted patch version to this email to see if we can get a test
> run of it.
>
> Thanks, I'm new to commitfest and I was confused as well.
No worries, we're here to help.
> I tried to reattach the thread there. I'll prepare a new patch soon, what should I do? Just attach it again?
Correct, just reply to the thread with a new version of the patch attached, and
it'll get picked up automatically. No need to do anything more.
cheers ./daniel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2020-07-02 12:59:01 | Re: POC: rational number type (fractions) |
| Previous Message | Josef Šimánek | 2020-07-02 12:42:16 | Re: [PATCH] Initial progress reporting for COPY command |