Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported
Date: 2018-05-02 05:17:44
Message-ID: CAFjFpRfapuzfnw0sF4rSz79=GvFoLrgrmObTXsS+DOJOtBm5KA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 4/26/18 05:03, Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 2018/04/26 13:01, David Rowley wrote:
>>> The attached small patch removes the mention that partitioned tables
>>> cannot have foreign keys defined on them.
>>>
>>> This has been supported since 3de241db
>>
>> I noticed also that the item regarding row triggers might be obsolete as
>> of 86f575948c7, thanks again to Alvaro! So, I updated your patch to take
>> care of that.
>
> committed both

AFAIK we still don't support BEFORE ROW triggers, so removing that
entry altogether is misleading.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-05-02 05:41:32 Re: A few warnings on Windows
Previous Message Amit Langote 2018-05-02 04:41:38 Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect