| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect |
| Date: | 2018-05-02 04:41:38 |
| Message-ID: | 1e04d2ca-330a-ba2d-d629-ea5e5010b7c6@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018/05/02 13:38, Amit Langote wrote:
> --- a/contrib/amcheck/expected/check_btree.out
> +++ b/contrib/amcheck/expected/check_btree.out
>
> +-- verify partitioned tables are rejected (error)
> +SELECT bt_index_check('bttest_partitioned');
> +ERROR: "bttest_partitioned" is not an index
>
> Perhaps, I'm just repeating what's already been said, but I think it might
> be better to have the word "partitioned" in the message.
>
> ERROR: "bttest_partitioned" is partitioned index
>
> ..which Robert seems to think might not be too bad.
>
> That will need adding some code to these modules like we did in
> c08d82f38ebf763 [1].
Sorry, it appears that our mail system added "[SPAM]" to the subject-line
for one reason or another, which I forgot to manually remove when editing
the email.
- Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2018-05-02 05:17:44 | Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2018-05-02 04:38:22 | Re: [SPAM] Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect |