| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables |
| Date: | 2018-06-06 03:51:54 |
| Message-ID: | CAFjFpRevm9kqKzvUCmF5w4TSSCgXG5uD5i4n9cdTjdSBsAxnTg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
> <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
>> Changed partition-wise statement to partitionwise.
>> Attached re-based patch.
>>
>>> The patch looks good to me. I don't think we can reduce it further.
>>> But we need some tests to test PWJ with default partitions. Marking
>>> this as ready for committer.
>
> Hi Rajkumar,
>
> partition_join ... FAILED
>
That made my heart stop for fraction of a second. I thought, something
happened which caused partition_join test fail in master. But then I
realised you are talking about Rajkumar's patch and test in that
patch. I think it's better to start a separate thread discussing his
patch, before I loose my heart ;)
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-06-06 03:55:06 | Re: Code of Conduct plan |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2018-06-06 03:48:33 | Re: I'd like to discuss scaleout at PGCon |