From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables |
Date: | 2018-06-06 02:41:13 |
Message-ID: | CAEepm=2u6yaPhtc_vrZwif6NwyE++NrtHkmpX2egOLr0y6r_0g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
<rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 2:00 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
> Changed partition-wise statement to partitionwise.
> Attached re-based patch.
>
>> The patch looks good to me. I don't think we can reduce it further.
>> But we need some tests to test PWJ with default partitions. Marking
>> this as ready for committer.
Hi Rajkumar,
partition_join ... FAILED
The regression test currently fails with your v4 patch because a
redundant Result node has been removed from a query plan. That may be
due to commit 11cf92f6 or nearby commits.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-06-06 02:58:32 | Re: Loaded footgun open_datasync on Windows |
Previous Message | Dennis Gearon | 2018-06-06 02:20:11 | Re: Code of Conduct plan |