Re: Commitfest remaining "Needs Review" items

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Commitfest remaining "Needs Review" items
Date: 2015-08-10 08:10:46
Message-ID: CAFjFpRdZD5T5=WtHUBgWdHzVFNNP0Ex2L-nnpQjaOZWwtB9Pvw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:

> Hello Hackers,
>
> There are a few "Needs Review" items remaining in the July commitfest.
> Reviewers, please take action - you are holding up the commitfest.
>
> In addition to these items, there are a bunch of items in "Ready for
> Committer" state. Committers: please help with those.
>
> * extends pgbench expressions with functions
>>
>
> Robert signed up as reviewer for this a long time ago. Ping, do you still
> plan to review this?
>
> * self-defined policy for sepgsql regression test
>>
>
> Stephen: would you have the time to handle this, please?
>
> * Allocate restart_lsn at the time of creating physical replication slot
>>
>
> Andres, can you have a look at this, please?
>
> * Parallel Seq scan
>>
>
> Jeff, Haribabu, you're signed up as reviewers. How's it going?
>
> * Join pushdown support for foreign tables
>>
>
> Ashutosh, KaiGai, Etsuro: You signed up as reviewers in spring, but there
> hasn't been any activity during this commitfest. What's the status of this
> patch? Do you plan to review this now?
>

There are three patches involved here. I have reviewed one of them. I am
planning to look at them within few days.

>
> * replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something more descriptive
>>
>
> This is not quite ready yet, but has had its fair share of review, so I'm
> going to move it to the next commitfest. Feel free to continue the
> discussion and review, though; I just don't want drag the commitfest
> because for this.
>
> * Unique Joins
>>
>
> Still needs to be reviewed. Any volunteers?
>
> * checkpoint continuous flushing
>>
>
> Per discussion on that thread, let's just do the sorting part now. Needs
> some cleanup, but it's almost there.
>
> - Heikki
>

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2015-08-10 08:11:16 Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2015-08-10 08:00:38 Re: Commitfest remaining "Needs Review" items