Re: Declarative partitioning - another take

From: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date: 2016-09-06 12:24:54
Message-ID: CAFjFpRcV-gah+COk+pncrQ2pcVXeH3pAynz7a8Jp8ZAHF-8Sbw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

This patch uses RangeBound structure. There's also a structure defined with
the same name in rangetypes.h with some slight differences. Should we
rename the one in partition.c as PartRangeBound or something like that to
avoid the confusion?

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-09-06 12:36:49 Re: pgsql: Add putenv support for msvcrt from Visual Studio 2013
Previous Message Christian Ullrich 2016-09-06 12:21:00 Re: pgsql: Add putenv support for msvcrt from Visual Studio 2013