Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
Date: 2019-02-04 18:12:40
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDqxqECkSH1x2ws+fokKGJB8dNBqLUAk4QURYtFpqHhRA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

po 4. 2. 2019 v 6:10 odesílatel Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
napsal:

> On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 02:17:49PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > It means to write own lexer and preparse source code before I start
> > checking.
> >
> > I think so block level PRAGMA is significantly better solution
>
> Please note that the latest patch is failing to apply, so I have moved
> the patch to next CF, waiting on author.
>

attached rebased patch

thank you for checking.

Regards

Pavel

--
> Michael
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
plpgsql-pragma-20190204.patch text/x-patch 10.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-02-04 18:41:13 Re: propagating replica identity to partitions
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-02-04 17:20:58 Re: propagating replica identity to partitions