Re: Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
Date: 2019-03-07 07:03:27
Message-ID: 4962ca18-81fe-a111-b10b-25e8e488efd2@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/4/19 8:12 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>  attached rebased patch

This patch has gone through a few iterations but I don't think there's
any agreement on what it should look like. There's been no code review
that I can see.

I think this should be pushed to PG13 at the least, perhaps returned
with comment or rejected.

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2019-03-07 07:11:51 Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-03-07 06:54:48 Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participate in comparisons