Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement
Date: 2019-02-04 05:10:53
Message-ID: 20190204051053.GK29064@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 02:17:49PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> It means to write own lexer and preparse source code before I start
> checking.
>
> I think so block level PRAGMA is significantly better solution

Please note that the latest patch is failing to apply, so I have moved
the patch to next CF, waiting on author.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-04 05:12:39 Re: [HACKERS] Support for Secure Transport SSL library on macOS as OpenSSL alternative
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-02-04 05:05:32 Re: [HACKERS] Two pass CheckDeadlock in contentent case