From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: syntax error: VACUUM ANALYZE VERBOSE (PostgreSQL 11 regression) |
Date: | 2018-10-31 08:34:44 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDksRK2mHLTLCqUsRC_9ceQZziXFnt81xxf+p+4V6z-DA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
st 31. 10. 2018 v 8:55 odesílatel Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
napsal:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 08:38:27AM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > ok. Unfortunatelly it is not mentioned in release notes - in not
> compatible
> > changes.
> >
> > This change can hit lot of users. It is small nonsense, but lot of people
> > use it.
>
> Please just look at the order of the words in the command. This is
> documented:
> VACUUM VERBOSE ANALYZE;
> However this version has never been documented, still unfortunately
> it was supported:
> VACUUM ANALYZE VERBOSE;
>
I miss a sentence in release note - like attention on order of keywords in
VACUUM xxx.
Regards
Pavel
--
> Michael
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nikolay Shaplov | 2018-10-31 08:40:48 | Re: [PATCH][PROPOSAL] Add enum releation option type |
Previous Message | Nagaura, Ryohei | 2018-10-31 08:33:05 | RE: Timeout parameters |