From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com> |
Cc: | Samrat Revagade <revagade(dot)samrat(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql: show only failed queries |
Date: | 2014-06-30 06:53:56 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDkBY_BZVCMg2qW8rP5ey_s07uqTFOR2-3v1zMUZ=3sYQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2014-06-30 8:17 GMT+02:00 Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com>:
> On 26 June 2014 11:53, Samrat Revagade Wrote:
>
>
>
> >> I am sending updated patch - buggy statement is printed via more
> logical psql_error function instead printf
>
>
>
> >Thank you for updating patch, I really appreciate your efforts.
>
>
>
> >Now, everything is good from my side.
>
> >* it apply cleanly to the current git master
>
> >* includes necessary docs
>
> >* I think It is very good and necessary feature.
>
>
>
> >If Kumar Rajeev Rastogi do not have any extra comments, then I
> think patch is ready for committer.
>
>
>
> I have reviewed this patch. Please find my review comments below:
>
> 1. Command start-up option (e.g. -a/--echo-all for --ECHO=all), for
> new functionality is not provided.
>
all not options entered via psql variables has psql option and psql
comment. I'll plan add new decription to --help-variables list.
If it is necessary I can add long option --echo-errors, I didn't a good
char for short option. Any idea?
> 2. New Command start-up option should be added in "psql --help" as
> well as in documentation.
>
depends on previous,
>
>
> Also as I understand, this new option is kind of sub-set of existing
> option (ECHO=query), so should not we display
>
> query string in the same format as it was getting printed earlier.
>
> Though I also feel that prefixing query with STATEMENT word will be
> helpful to grep but at the same time I am worried
>
> about inconsistency with existing option.
>
This is question. And I am not strong in feeling what should be preferred.
But still I am inclined to prefer a variant with STATEMENT prefix. Mode
with -a is used with different purpose than mode "show errors only" - and
output with prefix is much more consistent with log entry - and displaying
error. So I agree, so there is potential inconsistency (but nowhere is
output defined), but this output is more practical, when you are
concentrated to error's processing.
Regards
Pavel
>
>
> *Thanks and Regards,*
>
> *Kumar Rajeev Rastogi *
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Abhijit Menon-Sen | 2014-06-30 07:06:46 | Re: Providing catalog view to pg_hba.conf file - Patch submission |
Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2014-06-30 06:52:04 | Re: inherit support for foreign tables |