Re: Packages: Again

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Serge Rielau <serge(at)rielau(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Wolfgang Wilhelm <wolfgang20121964(at)yahoo(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Packages: Again
Date: 2017-01-21 04:12:15
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDdrcDZy4nUDH2TXXPbKjiB=qmzcDGwjgb7yZvsVU+Q3g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2017-01-20 17:01 GMT+01:00 Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:

> On 01/17/2017 09:26 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> MERGE isn't UPSERT, and isn't even in competition with UPSERT as a
>>> feature. I've written reams of text explaining why this is so in
>>> precise detail, ...
>>>
>>
>
> Hello,
>
> This is the webinar that started this whole thread (well the original
> thread, not this weird MERGE/UPSERT stuff):
>
> https://www.commandprompt.com/blog/postgresql_for_oracle_people/
>
> Thank you to everyone that responded. You will see in this Webinar that at
> least from the Oracle people perspective, PostgreSQL is not an option
> unless it has packages.
>
> The other item that people bring up a few times is Oracle Forms but as
> that is actually external (although dependent) on Oracle, I don't see that
> as our responsibility.

I see there request on package functions, that can be realised with our
schemas - schema function is +/- equal - and better support for package
variables - there is a patch for schema session variables.

Regards

Pavel

>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> JD
>
>
> --
> Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
> +1-503-667-4564
> PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
> Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
> Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-01-21 04:19:28 Re: pgsql: Logical replication
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-01-21 03:08:40 Re: Off-by-one oddity in minval for decreasing sequences