Re: possibility to specify template database for pg_regress

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: possibility to specify template database for pg_regress
Date: 2017-02-08 20:13:49
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDVLsHyOELymJHwD8m=OdpRjEr+Zt+dpQTnEu=EjHOKiw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

2017-02-08 8:33 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:

>
>
> 2017-02-08 8:30 GMT+01:00 Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>> > What is sense for list of databases?
>>
>> ECPG uses it for example, see 0992259.
>>
>> > Some option --template can be great - with backpatch if it is possible.
>>
>> That's not really complicated to patch... That could be a nice task
>> for a starter.
>>
>
> Today I am doing some training - I can look on it at evening
>

here is a patch

Regards

Pavel

>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>
>> --
>> Michael
>>
>
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
pg_regress-template-option.patch text/x-patch 3.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tobias Bussmann 2017-02-08 20:15:53 Re: Press Release Draft - 2016-02-09 Cumulative Update
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-02-08 19:54:17 Re: Backport of pg_statistics typos fix