Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement

Hi

út 9. 4. 2019 v 15:03 odesílatel David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> napsal:

> Hi Pavel,
>
> On 3/25/19 3:50 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > po 25. 3. 2019 v 8:38 odesílatel David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
> > <mailto:david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>> napsal:
> >
> > On 3/10/19 8:39 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > > Here is pragma patch with demo
> > We're still not getting real review for this patch and Andrew seems
> as
> > skeptical as anyone that this is the right way to go.
> >
> > I'm planning to mark it as rejected at the end of this CF.
> >
> >
> > I hope so Andrew will have some time to review this patch
>
> As discussed above, I have marked this patch as rejected. It appears
> that a more general purpose approach is required to get a consensus on
> this feature.
>

I have to accepted this decision. I cannot to write this patch more general
- it's absolute generic (or I didn't understand objections).

I agree so now, there are higher priorities, and there are not customers
for this patch. But from syntax, semantic perspective, this patch is
correct. Now, it is interesting for plpgsql_check users, and their voice
was not here, unfortunately. I cannot do more in this area.

Regards

Pavel

>
> Regards,
> --
> -David
> david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
>