| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: plpgsql pragma statement |
| Date: | 2019-04-09 13:03:46 |
| Message-ID: | 2847f907-ee82-7a0c-186f-f7e3c80d0cb1@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Pavel,
On 3/25/19 3:50 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> po 25. 3. 2019 v 8:38 odesílatel David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
> <mailto:david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>> napsal:
>
> On 3/10/19 8:39 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Here is pragma patch with demo
> We're still not getting real review for this patch and Andrew seems as
> skeptical as anyone that this is the right way to go.
>
> I'm planning to mark it as rejected at the end of this CF.
>
>
> I hope so Andrew will have some time to review this patch
As discussed above, I have marked this patch as rejected. It appears
that a more general purpose approach is required to get a consensus on
this feature.
Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2019-04-09 13:16:54 | Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2019-04-09 12:58:20 | Re: COLLATE: Hash partition vs UPDATE |