| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> |
| Cc: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: not fully correct error message |
| Date: | 2026-01-03 12:34:46 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRCAA0L7zQZaRVTByY1RxfpzV0Yy3dzYL2iccnDmGauUBA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
so 3. 1. 2026 v 13:23 odesílatel Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br> napsal:
> Em sáb., 3 de jan. de 2026 às 03:35, Pavel Stehule <
> pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> escreveu:
>
>> here is a patch (with small regress test)
>>
>
> An anonymous block doesn't accept vacuum too.
> Wouldn't it be better to specify what kind of block you are running
> instead of
> function, procedure or anonymous block ?
>
It is correct, but maybe too long.
Generally, there is a term "routine" as a synonym for "function, procedure
or any stored procedure code", but I am not sure how much is accepted by
the community
> regards
> Marcos
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2026-01-03 12:39:28 | Re: not fully correct error message |
| Previous Message | Andrey Borodin | 2026-01-03 12:22:35 | Re: confusing results from pg_get_replication_slots() |