Re: not fully correct error message

From: Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: not fully correct error message
Date: 2026-01-03 12:22:30
Message-ID: CAB-JLwZGsWHcK3tnD-uUZf=QTRC0NJQ7qxdQrDYk2b_uFPTaww@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Em sáb., 3 de jan. de 2026 às 03:35, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
escreveu:

> here is a patch (with small regress test)
>

An anonymous block doesn't accept vacuum too.
Wouldn't it be better to specify what kind of block you are running instead
of
function, procedure or anonymous block ?

regards
Marcos

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Borodin 2026-01-03 12:22:35 Re: confusing results from pg_get_replication_slots()
Previous Message Jim Vanns 2026-01-03 11:42:18 Re: [PATCH] Add support for SAOP in the optimizer for partial index paths