| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christian Convey <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Tackling JsonPath support |
| Date: | 2016-11-29 06:37:54 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRC8FFX9=+yi_im8bBJP0GJrv92hSuoFUH0nft62QLk0oQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2016-11-29 7:34 GMT+01:00 Christian Convey <christian(dot)convey(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> We now support XPath function - JSONPath is similar to XPath - it is
>> better for user, because have to learn only one language.
>>
>
> I'm not sure I understand.
>
> Are you suggesting that we use XPath, not JSONPath, as our language for
> json-path expressions?
>
surely not.
follow ANSI/SQL :)
Pavel
>
> - C
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vladimir Borodin | 2016-11-29 07:03:55 | Re: GIN non-intrusive vacuum of posting tree |
| Previous Message | Christian Convey | 2016-11-29 06:34:44 | Re: Tackling JsonPath support |