Re: proposal: row_to_array function

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: row_to_array function
Date: 2015-01-16 17:22:00
Message-ID: CAFj8pRC7EV+jsOqie5QhtjVQbcX=B_FrWcVUdirweeCMZK1xBg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2015-01-16 18:03 GMT+01:00 Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>:

> On 1/16/15 3:45 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>> I am returning back to processing records in plpgsql.
>>
>> I am thinking so it can be simply processed with transformations to array.
>>
>> Now we have similar functions - hstore(row), row_to_json, ... but using
>> of these functions can be a useless step. Any row variable can be
>> transformed to 2D text array.
>>
>
> How is it useless? Why wouldn't you just use JSON and be done with it?
>

We can use a FOREACH IN ARRAY iteration in plpgsql (second variant is a
implementation FOREACH for jsonb)

so ROW->ARRAY is shorter than ROW->JSON->ARRAY or ROW->HSTORE->ARRAY

>
> Do you have some use cases you can share?
>

processing of NEW, OLD variables in triggers

>
> There two possible transformations:
>>
>> row_to_array --> [[key1, value1],[key2, value2], ...]
>> row_to_row_array --> [(key1, value1), (key2, value2), ... ]
>>
>
> If we're going to go that route, I think it makes more sense to create an
> actual key/value type (ie: http://pgxn.org/dist/pair/doc/pair.html) and
> return an array of that.
>

ok

> --
> Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
> Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2015-01-16 17:23:10 Re: proposal: lock_time for pg_stat_database
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-01-16 17:21:13 Re: [PATCH] HINT: pg_hba.conf changed since last config reload