| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal - queryid can be used as filter for auto_explain |
| Date: | 2026-04-15 07:39:28 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRBesaYDp8KmvHvDAiT+QMZT4LLTvWFo8JSPaF=qJ35MGQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
st 15. 4. 2026 v 8:37 odesílatel Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
napsal:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 11:02 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 06:46:24AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > >
> > > I have to investigate strange behaviour of some specific query. One
> > > possibility is non stability of plan. This is a bigger server with a
> bigger
> > > load, and I am a little bit afraid to use auto_explain for all queries.
> > >
> > > Currently auto_explain doesn't support it, but it can be practical if
> we
> > > can specify a list of queryid as a filter of auto_explain.
> > >
> > > What do you think about this idea?
> >
> > +1. I don't think it's something that will be useful very often, but
> when it's
> > going to be useful it would be *extremely* convenient to have.
>
> +1 too.
>
> The only doubt would be: if that's new GUC, then this is list of queryIDs,
> right? So do you plan also logging the queryid from auto_explain directly
> or
> one should have %Q in log_line_prefix?
>
I plan a new GUC with a list of values. I haven't thought about
implementation yet. I'll send a prototype next week.
Regards
Pavel
> -J.
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Smith | 2026-04-15 07:41:10 | Re: Add missing period to DETAIL messages |
| Previous Message | Lakshmi N | 2026-04-15 06:58:01 | Typo fixes in Graph table files |