Re: proposal - queryid can be used as filter for auto_explain

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal - queryid can be used as filter for auto_explain
Date: 2026-04-15 07:39:28
Message-ID: CAFj8pRBesaYDp8KmvHvDAiT+QMZT4LLTvWFo8JSPaF=qJ35MGQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

st 15. 4. 2026 v 8:37 odesílatel Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
napsal:

> On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 11:02 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 06:46:24AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > >
> > > I have to investigate strange behaviour of some specific query. One
> > > possibility is non stability of plan. This is a bigger server with a
> bigger
> > > load, and I am a little bit afraid to use auto_explain for all queries.
> > >
> > > Currently auto_explain doesn't support it, but it can be practical if
> we
> > > can specify a list of queryid as a filter of auto_explain.
> > >
> > > What do you think about this idea?
> >
> > +1. I don't think it's something that will be useful very often, but
> when it's
> > going to be useful it would be *extremely* convenient to have.
>
> +1 too.
>
> The only doubt would be: if that's new GUC, then this is list of queryIDs,
> right? So do you plan also logging the queryid from auto_explain directly
> or
> one should have %Q in log_line_prefix?
>

I plan a new GUC with a list of values. I haven't thought about
implementation yet. I'll send a prototype next week.

Regards

Pavel

> -J.
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2026-04-15 07:41:10 Re: Add missing period to DETAIL messages
Previous Message Lakshmi N 2026-04-15 06:58:01 Typo fixes in Graph table files