Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table

po 19. 11. 2018 v 3:42 odesílatel Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
napsal:

> On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 11:17:37PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > To be certain I'm not going against some old decision, I digged up
> > Amit's old patches. Turns out he submitted psql's describe.c using the
> > term "partitioned table" on August 10th [1] and then based on a
> > discussion where Robert suggested calling these new objects "partition
> > roots" instead to avoid confusion, it was changed to "table" in the next
> > submission on August 26th [2]. It seems the right call to have used the
> > term "table" in many places (rather than "partition roots"), but at
> > least in psql's \dt it seems extremely useful to show the type as
> > "partitioned table" instead, because it is one place where the
> > distinction is clearly useful.
>
> +1.
>
> > In this thread there have been no contrary votes, so I'm pushing this
> > part soon.
> >
> > [1]
> https://postgr.es/m/ad16e2f5-fc7c-cc2d-333a-88d4aa446f96@lab.ntt.co.jp
> > [2]
> https://postgr.es/m/169708f6-6e5a-18d1-707b-1b323e4a6baf@lab.ntt.co.jp
>
> Sorry for degressing, but could you also update \di at the same time so
> as it shows "partitioned index"? listTables() should be switched to use
> partitioned tables and partitioned indexes, and permissionsList() has a
> reference to partitioned tables. While on it, this gives the attached..
>

It has sense

Pavel

--
> Michael
>