From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Serge Rielau <serge(at)rielau(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: schema variables |
Date: | 2017-10-31 21:10:43 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRB9YEzD_-qno8Y2Xj08f4gu2LYJFBd1QDW82EKPW-vmsQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
2017-10-31 22:08 GMT+01:00 Serge Rielau <serge(at)rielau(dot)com>:
> Pavel,
>
> I can imagine, so DECLARE command will be introduced as short cut for
> CREATE TEMP VARIABLE, but in this moment I would not to open this topic. I
> afraid of bikeshedding and I hope so CREATE TEMP VAR is anough.
>
> Language is important because language stays.
> You choice of syntax will outlive your code and possibly yourself.
>
sure. But in this moment I don't see difference between DECLARE VARIABLE
and CREATE TEMP VARIABLE different than "TEMP" keyword.
Regards
Pavel
> My 2 cents
> Serge
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shubham Barai | 2017-10-31 21:10:44 | Re: GSoC 2017 : Patch for predicate locking in Gist index |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-10-31 21:08:47 | Dynamic result sets from procedures |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | srielau | 2017-10-31 21:28:37 | Re: proposal: schema variables |
Previous Message | Serge Rielau | 2017-10-31 21:08:18 | Re: proposal: schema variables |