From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: onlyvalue aggregate (was: First Aggregate Funtion?) |
Date: | 2015-10-28 16:53:07 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRAz6sMcrdqx882MxZU9Yc1Cd_7k-epExJCEt4vF2yQmfQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2015-10-28 17:50 GMT+01:00 Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>:
> Hi,
>
> Here's a patch for the aggregate function outlined by Corey Huinker in
> CADkLM=foA_oC_Ri23F9PbfLnfwXFbC3Lt8bBzRu3=CB77G9_qw(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com . I
> called it "onlyvalue", which is a horrible name, but I have nothing better
> to offer. (Corey called it "only", but that doesn't really work since ONLY
> is a fully reserved keyword.)
>
> I'll add this to September's commit fest, but if you want to bash me or
> the patch in the meanwhile, go ahead.
>
Hi
what is use case for this function and why it should be in core?
Regards
Pavel
>
>
> .m
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabio Oliveira De Mendonca | 2015-10-28 16:59:37 | ExclusiveLock on PostgreSQL - Fabio Mendonça |
Previous Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2015-10-28 16:50:19 | onlyvalue aggregate (was: First Aggregate Funtion?) |