Re: onlyvalue aggregate (was: First Aggregate Funtion?)

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: onlyvalue aggregate (was: First Aggregate Funtion?)
Date: 2015-10-28 16:53:07
Message-ID: CAFj8pRAz6sMcrdqx882MxZU9Yc1Cd_7k-epExJCEt4vF2yQmfQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2015-10-28 17:50 GMT+01:00 Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>:

> Hi,
>
> Here's a patch for the aggregate function outlined by Corey Huinker in
> CADkLM=foA_oC_Ri23F9PbfLnfwXFbC3Lt8bBzRu3=CB77G9_qw(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com . I
> called it "onlyvalue", which is a horrible name, but I have nothing better
> to offer. (Corey called it "only", but that doesn't really work since ONLY
> is a fully reserved keyword.)
>
> I'll add this to September's commit fest, but if you want to bash me or
> the patch in the meanwhile, go ahead.
>

Hi

what is use case for this function and why it should be in core?

Regards

Pavel

>
>
> .m
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabio Oliveira De Mendonca 2015-10-28 16:59:37 ExclusiveLock on PostgreSQL - Fabio Mendonça
Previous Message Marko Tiikkaja 2015-10-28 16:50:19 onlyvalue aggregate (was: First Aggregate Funtion?)