Re: Checking return value of SPI_execute

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Checking return value of SPI_execute
Date: 2019-11-06 05:54:16
Message-ID: CAFj8pRAuzJNOCm3SCu2oZBMKKN0A8KaRhk+Sn2jUeYo_LDpE_g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

st 6. 11. 2019 v 5:28 odesílatel Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
napsal:

> On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 05:21:25PM -0800, Mark Dilger wrote:
> > please find attached a patch fixing a problem previously discussed [1]
> about
> > the code inappropriately ignoring the return value from SPI_execute.
> >
> > I will be adding this to https://commitfest.postgresql.org/26/
> > shortly.
>
> Yes, this should be fixed.
>
> > - SPI_execute(query, true, 0);
> > + spi_result = SPI_execute(query, true, 0);
> > + if (spi_result < 0)
> > + elog(ERROR, "SPI_execute returned %s",
> SPI_result_code_string(spi_result));
>
> Any queries processed in xml.c are plain SELECT queries, so it seems
> to me that you need to check after SPI_OK_SELECT as only valid
> result.
>

Is generic question if this exception should not be raised somewhere in
spi.c - maybe at SPI_execute

When you look to SPI_execute_plan, then checked errors has a character +/-
assertions. All SQL errors are ended by a exception. This API is not too
consistent after years what is used.

I agree so this result code should be tested for better code quality. But
this API is not consistent now, and should be refactored to use a
exceptions instead result codes. Or instead error checking, a assertions
should be used.

What do you think about it?

Pavel

--
> Michael
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2019-11-06 06:03:43 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Previous Message Tatsuro Yamada 2019-11-06 05:49:49 Re: progress report for ANALYZE